California Integrated Waste Management Board Honors 250 Businesses That Reduce Waste Sent To Landfills

Posted on December 1, 2009 by admin

The California Integrated Waste Management Board on Monday honored more than 250 businesses and nonprofit organizations for efforts to reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills.

Winners in the state’s Waste Reduction Awards Program ranged from tech giants Hewlett-Packard Co, Intel Corp and NEC Electronics America Inc. Hewlett-Packard’s Roseville campus now diverts 91 percent of its waste material, from recycling cardboard and paper products to reusing bubble wrap. NEC’s manufacturing plant, also in Roseville, last year diverted 82 percent of its solid waste, raising $430,625 in recycling revenue for the company.

Driven by aggressive state mandates, recycling has become a major industry in California. The sector employs 85,000 and produces $10 billion in goods and services annually, according to the waste board.

To make the list of recycling honorees, a company must demonstrate an annual improvement in its waste-reduction practices, according to Beatriz Sandoval, a spokeswoman for the Integrated Waste Management Board.

The agency has been publishing the list since 1993. Because of the breadth of industries represented, there are no set standards for qualifying, Sandoval said. Nearly every company submitting documentation to the agency wins an award.

Nokia Files Lawsuit Complaint Against 11 LCD Manufacturers In San Francisco Court. Alleges Price Fixing

Posted on December 1, 2009 by admin

Nokia Corp. is suing 11 companies and a number of their units in the U.S., alleging they colluded to fix prices on liquid crystal displays.

Nokia’s suit comes as the LCD industry begins to emerge from a long downturn that had led to weak panel prices. LCDs are used in screens for mobile phones, personal computers and televisions.

The Finnish mobile handset giant alleges in the complaint—filed Nov. 25 with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco—that the companies raised “the price of LCDs above the price that would have prevailed in a competitive market” from at least Jan. 1, 1996 through Dec. 11, 2006.

Nokia said it purchased LCDs from the companies and then incorporated them into its mobile wireless handsets.

Three of the LCD makers accused in the suit said Tuesday they hadn’t received any documents from the U.S. court, three others said they were looking into the matter, two declined to comment and the rest couldn’t be reached for comment.

Nokia spokesman Mark Durrant said his company also filed related complaints in the U.K., against makers of LCDs and cathode ray tubes, which are used in older televisions.

Nokia believes it has a strong position in the case because there is no doubt that price fixing has been going on, Mr. Durrant said, though he declined to say how much money could be involved.

Mr. Durrant said it could take a few years to reach a settlement in court, but added that his company is interested in discussing compensation outside of the court system.

Analysts said legal battles take a while to settle so the suit won’t likely have an immediate impact on the LCD makers, though they said the companies may need to set aside provisions from their earnings in the longer term.

The complaint against the group of companies—which includes AU Optronics Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Sharp Corp. and LG Display Co.—is the latest in a string of accusations of price fixing in the LCD industry.

AT&T Corp. alleged in a suit filed in October in U.S. District Court in San Francisco that AU Optronics, LG Display, Samsung Electronics and other LCD makers were involved in a “long-running conspiracy” from January 1996 to December 2006 to fix prices of LCD panels.

That complaint, filed by AT&T and its BellSouth and Pacific Bell units, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. and others, alleged the LCD makers formed an international cartel to illegally restrict competition in the U.S. for LCD panels.

Nokia’s complaint also comes about a year after the U.S. Justice Department fined several LCD makers for price fixing.

Sharp, Chunghwa and LG Display agreed in November 2008 to plead guilty to the U.S. charges of price fixing in the LCD market from as early as April 2001 to December 2006. The companies paid $585 million in criminal fines.

Samsung Electronics, the world’s largest LCD maker, wasn’t cited in the Justice Department’s decision but it cooperated with U.S. investigators in the probe, people close to the case said. The probe into the LCD industry became public in 2006.

The European Commission in May 2009 sent formal charges to a number of companies supplying LCDs on suspicion that they have operated a cartel. The commission didn’t name the companies at the time but in July, Philips Electronics N.V. confirmed it received cartel charges from the European Commission alleging price fixing.

Other companies named in Nokia’s suit include Philips Electronics, Tatung Co., Seiko EpsonCorp., Samsung SDI Co., Hitachi Displays Ltd. and Toshiba Corp.

Hitachi Displays agreed in March to plead guilty to the U.S. Justice Department’s price-fixing charges and paid a $31 million fine. Hitachi isn’t a defendant in the AT&T case.

“Nokia suffered damages as a result…and is entitled to treble damages and injunctive relief to remedy these injuries,” Nokia said in its complaint.

Chunghwa Picture Tubes deputy spokesman Wilbur Chien said Tuesday his company hasn’t received any court documents and declined to comment further on the Nokia case. Freda Lee, a spokeswoman for AU Optronics, also said the company hasn’t received any court documents from the U.S.

A Tatung investor relations official also said the company hasn’t received any official documents from the court.

Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori declined to comment. Samsung Electronics also declined to comment.

Officials at Seiko Epson, Samsung SDI and LG Display said they were looking into the matter, while officials at Sharp, Hitachi, and Philips, weren’t immediately available for comment.

Sheila Davis (Executive Director, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition SVTC) Addresses The International Electronics Recycling Conference & Expo IERCE 09′

Posted on November 27, 2009 by admin

Sheila Davis is the Executive Director of Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) based in Northern California. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition is a diverse organization engaged in research, advocacy and grassroots organizing to promote human health and environmental justice in response to the rapid growth of the high-tech industry. In this Webinar, Sheila shares her organizations discoveries after visiting Taiwan, India, Germany and a host of other countries. VIDEO COMING SOON! Click Sheila’s picture for the audio.

India Drowning In Nearly Half A Million Tons Of E-waste Generated Annually.

Posted on November 23, 2009 by admin

Without recycling facilities that can handle the loads of e-waste that need to be processed, Priti Mahesh, senior programme officer with New Delhi-based Toxic Link, says that 97% of the waste gets recycled in hazardous conditions, where workers are exposed to toxins like barium, cadmium, copper and lead.

The scale of the problem is getting government attention, with a draft of a law intending to curb the imports of e-waste and regulate recycling in the works and ready in about 6 months. However, it points to the bigger picture of too many new and unnecessary gadgets pouring into the market place, and too many old but perfectly usable gadgets pouring into dumps and recycling facilities.

Again, while percentages are unclear, “most of the waste from abroad came in the form of charity donations of old technology that finds its way to dumps or imports from countries like the United States, [Mahesh] said.”

As countries like India suffering the brunt of e-waste imports get tougher on importation legislation, organizations like Basel Action Network & ToxicsLink will have to do a tougher job as environmental watchdog groups, since more companies collecting gadgets for recycling will be tempted to unload them onto overburdened, under-protected e-waste dumps.

E-Waste Legislation Varies Among Asian Nations

Posted on November 23, 2009 by admin

Step by step, e-waste legislation is introduced at different paces in countries like China, Malaysia and Thailand. Calls are heard for increased global harmonisation of laws to tackle the problem.

Developing nations are expected to triple their output of e-waste by 2010. The effect of booming economies and increased IT consumption all over the world makes electronic waste pile up in landfills or in private homes. Increasingly loud voices call for global harmonisation of e-waste legislation. The state of e-waste policies in Malaysia, Thailand and China reveal how different the same, global problem is tackled by different legislators.

Malaysia – no proper recycling
Malaysia is part of the Basel Convention treaty which restricts the export of hazardous waste from developed countries to developing countries. The Malaysian Association of Standards Users criticises that there is no proper recycling mechanism in place at the moment to encourage consumers to recycle or discard e-waste. Malaysian consumers recycle about five per cent of their e-waste. In Malaysia e-waste is categorised as scheduled wastes under the code SW 110, First Schedule, Environmental Quality (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations 2005. But this act does not deal with household waste. The Malaysian Government has not, despite a grand campaign, changed public behaviour in or attitudes to waste recycling.

Thai RoHS – voluntary marking
The new Thai standard on RoHS-conformity marking took effect in February 2009. The standard is voluntary and more of resemblance to a label than to legislation, which may help in marketing. The standard goes under the name ‘Electrical and electronic equipment that may contain hazardous substances: restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances.’ It covers equipment that falls within the scope of EU RoHS. Consumers recycle about half their discarded electronic goods.

China – introducing RoHS and WEEE but slow progress
China, the world’s largest user community for products like mobile phones, computers and TV sets, has introduced RoHS which is finally on its way to its second step with compulsory and specific product requirements. The country, which previously did not define waste comprehensively in the law, will introduce e-waste legislation from 2011. Electronic products must then contain information on toxic and harmful contents and recycling processing. This will also include recycling and processing requirements.